For hospital revenue teams

Find the holds worth acting on.

Turn repeat billing holds into a verified review queue linked directly to source files.

RevenueFloor / floor signalSchematic view
FLOOR
~1.5sTickmark extraction
24,230DoH tariff codes
3-8%ClaimAct typical gap
Signal is illustrativeFigures describe tools, not hospital results
  1. 01 / ChoosePick one repeat hold queue.
  2. 02 / ReviewTrace each item to its source and owner.
  3. 03 / DecideCheck the bill, then check the cash.

Public path Work email only. No patient details, files, or payment on this page.

The system / extraction → analysis → compliance

An end-to-end revenue cycle, built from working tools.

RevenueFloor connects source capture, local reimbursement variance analysis, and inpatient claim review. Each stage gives the next one a clearer record to examine.

01 / Capture

Tickmark

Extraction / live

The coding hour your billers get back.

Reads printed HCPCS superbills, CMS-1500 forms, and tick sheets; submission-ready rows in ~1.5s.

Deterministic preprocess + two-model consensus + CMS HCPCS crosswalk validator.

From $49/month · 5 extractions free trial
Explore Tickmark
02 / Compare

RevenueFloor variance engine

Reimbursement analysis / local

Local, aggregate reimbursement variance by care setting (outpatient / day-case / inpatient), priced against the current DoH Mandatory Tariff (24,230 codes: CPT, HCPCS, USCLS, DRG) and realized remittance medians.

Flags likely setting/coding misclassification. No case data leaves the machine.

RevenueFloor's own engine
03 / Review

ClaimAct

Compliance recovery / live

The three to eight percent a compliance audit will never find.

Reads every inpatient claim, checks full severity capture. Typical gap 3-8% of gross revenue across a 50,000-claim year.

Shadow Leakage Audit, EMV Dispatch, HTLOS Outlier Monitor, Portfolio Exposure Scanner. All run in-browser, no backend.

From AED 7,500/month per hospital
Explore ClaimAct
Clinical boundarySite of care is a clinical decision. This report shows how reimbursement varies by the setting a case was recorded under and flags records whose setting or coding may be misclassified. It does not recommend moving any patient to a different setting for revenue.
Proof / RF77-SYN-001

What could be at stake for your hospital?

See how it works

Start with the evidence shape. The figures below are linked to a source file so every assumption can be checked.

Synthetic example. Invented figures, not hospital results.

Beds only scale the display. They do not predict loss.

Ledger row Label Value Source
Staffed beds Assumption 100 RF77-SYN-001
Bill value released Assumption SAR 30,000 RF77-SYN-001
Currency Assumption SAR RF77-SYN-001
Cash with review Assumption SAR 24,000 RF77-SYN-001
Assumed cash without review Assumption SAR 14,000 RF77-SYN-001
Total review cost Assumption SAR 8,000 RF77-SYN-001
Extra cash under these assumptions Calculation SAR 10,000 RF77-SYN-001
Net gain after costs Calculation SAR 2,000 RF77-SYN-001
Net gain per 100 staffed beds per month Calculation SAR 2,000 RF77-SYN-001

Observation period: 1 month. This is an assumed additional collections example, not a payment-timing claim.

Request scope

This is not a forecast. Your result could be negative. If we cannot support a baseline, we report cash received and leave added gain blank.

This example assumes the cash difference is added collections, not a payment moved from a later month. If only payment timing changes, report that separately.

Worked example / RF77-SYN-002

Bill released. Cash not yet verified.

A bill appears on a dated hold report. The owner checks the current billing system. In this invented case, a required attachment is missing. The team adds it and confirms bill release. Cash stays unverified until a remittance is matched.

Bill released

SAR 1,000 bill value

Cash not yet verified

Cash not yet verified

Incremental gain

Incremental gain not yet verified

RF77-SYN-002 SQL · RF77-SYN-002 JSON

Operating boundary

How the review works

01 / ReportAgree the dated queue and current source.
02 / ReviewKeep stable keys and records locally; name the owner and action.
03 / BillConfirm current billing state and what changed.
04 / CashReconcile payment separately against remittance.

No real data upload fields. No patient details requested.

See the paid pilot: scope, weekly deliverables, and price

Fixed-price audits

Find the leakage floor in your own export.

Clinic Leakage Floor Audit

AED 5,000 · fixed fee, one time

One clinic, one de-identified claim-line export, one readout call.

See clinic scope

Hospital Leakage Floor Audit

AED 20,000 · fixed fee, one time

One hospital, up to three de-identified exports, two readout calls.

See hospital scope
Scope discussion

Start with one hold queue.

Tell us which repeat billing holds your team needs to review. We agree the source, owner and scope before any work starts.

This is a scope discussion. No price, checkout, turnaround or outcome is promised here.

Download synthetic case JSON

Figures describe the reviewed queue only. Bed scaling does not estimate the whole hospital’s losses.

This form records your work email only. Do not send patient details or files.

This public intake records only your work email and the bounded-review request source.

We reply to the work email you provide. A scope discussion does not start paid work.